The events of the day was more focussed on the victory and subsequently figuring out why the damages were so low. As I was thinking more about this and given the line of questions that Jury was asking (what # do they apply for damages)….they have possibly come out 3.5% of total damages (i.e from 2004 onwards).
Take for instance AOL’s overall original damages –$22.6M …and 35 % of that is $7.9M. However, in case of Google they have used 3.5% of 451M to come come up with $15.8M damages.
Let’s hope Judge Jackson makes the correction or vringo team requests for the same.