The events of the day was more focussed on the victory and subsequently figuring out why the damages were so low. As I was thinking more about this and given the line of questions that Jury was asking (what # do they apply for damages)….they have possibly come out 3.5% of total damages (i.e from 2004 onwards).

Take for instance AOL’s overall original damages –$22.6M …and 35 % of that is $7.9M. However, in case of Google they have used 3.5% of 451M to come come up with $15.8M damages.

Let’s hope Judge Jackson makes the correction or vringo team requests for the same.


2 responses »

  1. Hi Percy.
    Just found your board, are you still following the case?
    I will look at the donation info. Still long. Thx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s